>Did you actually read my post, or just the title? What's your take on that? It seems pretty reasonable to me.Īlso about the chart you mention, as I've written in another post, that chart was mostly fairly new stuff, I'm interested in earlier works. I once saw a chart for a list of pedo books(older man, younger girl) read that if you wanna get off.Īnonymous Fri Aug 14 07:34:20 2020 No.16126906ĭid you actually read my post, or just the title? I was also interested in the aspect that no works like that are currently in the canon - if you ask the average joe, or even someone that is slightly above average interested in literature about literature that implies pedophilia or hebephilia, they wouldn't know, although, if we assume that works like that must exist and that they were not at the fringes of culture, but popular to some extent, which we can reasonably assume, since there was this outrage of French intellectuals defending such relationships, it seems highly likely, that some superficial force must have interefered with the canon here. >TL DR I want a pedo book chart but am too afraid to explicitly ask
>n-no I don't want a virgin 13 year old bride like generations of men before me I want a 30 year old who has taken miles of nigger dick to give me 1 highly autistic childĪnonymous Fri Aug 14 07:24:58 2020 No.16126864 Is the demonization of cunny love the biggest cope in Western history? It's titled "Sexual Morality and the Law", if you're interested.Īnonymous Fri Aug 14 07:24:22 2020 No.16126861 I just googled, he gave a radio interview about it, and this radio interview got transcribed and published. You're really not making a good argument for your continued existence.Īnonymous Fri Aug 14 07:14:22 2020 No.16126820Īren't Romeo and Juliet both teenagers though? That would make the relationship not pedophilic, but "normal", right?Īnonymous Fri Aug 14 07:16:05 2020 No.16126827Ĭan you give me the title of the Foucault book you mean?Īlso, I'm aware of the chart you mention, but if I remember correctly it mostly contains fairly "modern" books. Imagine being so pozzed in the head you genuinely believe teenagers aren't capable of consenting to sexual intercourse while 100% being able to consent to and understand sexual reassignment therapy.Īnonymous Fri Aug 14 07:09:07 2020 No.16126783 Read Foucault (he wrote a book about it), also there is a chart about pedo literature.Īnonymous Fri Aug 14 07:08:59 2020 No.16126782Ĭunnybros will inherit the Earth. What the fuck happened? Where'd they go? Why'd we "forget" them? Does anyone here know any? >Īnonymous Fri Aug 14 07:06:43 2020 No.16126770
I just simply can't imagine that there are no major works featuring (heterosexual) pedophilia/ hebephilia that isn't judgemental about it, and demonising a relationship like that from that time or earlier. superficially and forcefully push them out of the canon, once "we" "realised" that the age of consent at about 18 is "good"? Is it because "someone" / "we" (?) quickly tried to rid ourselves of them, i.e.
Yet, I'm not aware of any books like that. That being so, you would imagine that there are many works of literature exploring the notion of pedophilia/ hebephilia in a positive, romantic (not necessarily sexual), idealised manner? - Not just from around this timeframe within which above mentioned age of consent controversies arose, but also earlier.
Apparently, age of consent laws as we know them today - with the average age of consent being around 16-18 years - only really emerged around the latter half of the 20th century around the time they were put into place, many notable French intellectuals (including Sartre, others were mentioned but I don't remember them) were strongly opposed to those laws and what they stood for. I remember some anon posting here before about how pedophilia was much more wide-spread in 20th century Europe (especially France), and they cited some "avant-garde" French journal that featured a story titled "Teach love to your children" (pic related). Pedophilia in 19th and 20th century Europe Anonymous Fri Aug 14 06:54:12 2020 No.16126712
0 kommentar(er)
